APRLOG
中文English

APRLOG / Tools / Past payout review board

Past payout review board

Data verified 2026-08-23; prices at the 2026-08-22 daily close. This is a hand-checked local snapshot, not a live feed — the page does not move with the market. Binance's own pages and announcements govern.

APRLOG cover: item T2, a calendar-grid graphic beside the tool number
T2 · the sortable review board. Cover generated programmatically.

What this page is: Binance's published “average airdrop per BNB” multiplied by real daily closes, so you can see what each round actually paid. Click a column heading to sort. The full basis and sources are below.

TokenPaid Average
per BNB
Listing day
$ per BNB
Payout day
$ per BNB
2026-08-22
$ per BNB
Share of
BNB value
Payout
to now
CHIP
USD.AI
2026-04-281.69880.10420.11710.05130.019%-56.2%
AIGENSYN
Gensyn
2026-05-216.83580.27300.21160.13990.033%-33.9%
GENIUS
Genius Terminal
2026-05-290.68450.42790.31080.22860.046%-26.5%
OPG
OpenGradient
2026-06-300.49230.10730.06440.04750.011%-26.4%

All four are Binance HODLer airdrops. Dollars per BNB = average per BNB × that column's close. Share of BNB value = payout-day dollars ÷ the average BNB close across the qualifying window.

Sources

What the three pricing bases mean

BasisWhich dayWhat it tells you
Listing dayThe token's first daily candle on Binance spotReference only — you usually did not hold it yet
Payout dayThe day the official announcement was publishedThe meaningful one: the first day you could sell
2026-08-22The last complete trading day at time of writingEquivalent to never having sold

Why listing day is reference-only: all four are retroactive distributions, so the token was often trading before you received any. OPG is the extreme case — it listed 2026-05-22 while this round's window ran in late June, so that column does not apply to it at all.

Why four rounds, and why no APR

Four rounds because Binance's page currently retains the average-per-BNB field for four. Without that official number the calculation would rest on an estimate of pool size, and an estimate cannot be published as fact. Rounds we cannot verify are left out.

No annualised figure because projecting a three-day one-off across a year assumes it repeats identically all year, which it does not. This site keeps making that point, so it does not make the same move itself. Reasoning in the piece on annualised rates.

Equally, the four shares should not be added into a period return — the page retains four rounds, which is not the same as four rounds having happened.

Limits of this dataset

  1. Four rounds across about three months. Far too little for inference.
  2. Daily closes, not your fills: no slippage, no fees, no timing.
  3. “Average per BNB” is a platform-wide average; your own allocation depends on your share.
  4. A hand-checked snapshot with no automatic update. We refresh manually and move the verification date when we do.

The written analysis is in four airdrops, reviewed — the same snapshot, not a second set of numbers.

Common questions

Are these figures live?

No. Prices are taken at the 2026-08-22 daily close in a hand-checked snapshot. The page does not follow the market; we refresh manually and move the verification date.

Why is the listing-day column only a reference?

Because all four are retroactive distributions and the token was often already trading before you received any, so you could not have sold at that price. OPG is the extreme case: it listed a month before this round's qualifying window.

Can I reproduce these numbers?

Yes. Average per BNB comes from the completed-projects block on the Binance Launchpool page, windows from each round's announcement, and prices from the public market-data endpoint's daily closes. Multiply and you get every figure here.

Why is there no annualised return?

Because projecting a three-day one-off across a year assumes it repeats identically all year, which it does not. This site argues against that extrapolation, so it does not perform it either.